– ๐๐ง ๐ ๐๐โ๐ฌ ๐๐ฑ๐๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐๐๐ซ๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ซ๐ฒ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ข๐ญ๐ญ๐๐๐ฌ
-by Radha Motielall
Speaker of the National Assembly and Chairman of the Committee of Selection Hon. Manzoor Nadir has called out opposition MP and Chief Whip, Tabitha Sarabo-Halley for a disingenuous attempt to mislead the public.
The matter pertains to the exclusion of Forward Guyana Movement leader and lone representative in the House, Amanza Walton-Desir from any of the parliamentary committees recently appointed.
Sarabo-Halley recently took to social media trying to discredit the work of the Chairman of the Committee of Selection, by claiming that he was in breach of standing order 80-5 during the recent reconstitution of the parliamentary committees.
According to the WIN Chief Whip, while the FGM was excluded based on the parliamentary calculations for seats on the committees, WIN wanted Walton-Desir to sit in their space on some of the committees.
She claims, however, that the speaker did not allow this and was therefore in breach of the standing order which says any member of the assembly, elected or non-elected, is eligible for membership of any committee.
โThere is no standing orders, there is no rule, there is no sections of the standing orders that indicates that there is exception to that particular rule,โ Sarabo-Halley claims.
Speaker Manzoor Nadir, however, noted that Sarabo-Halley โconvenientlyโ left out some important words from that standing order, and that is (Unless and Otherwise provided in the Standing Orders).
He said, โIf she was genuine, she would have gone to Standing Order 94-1, which says that the committees of parliament must reflect the composition of parliament.โ
Nadir also stated that the calculations used to allocate seats on Committees were not invented by himself but are in fact long standing convention which he complies with.
Further, he advises Sarabo-Halley to be genuine by reflecting and reporting exactly what the rules are and not omitting significant parts of it.
He says her entire presentation on the matter was a disservice to the Leader of the Opposition.
